Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kang, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, H.-J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Model Selection Indices for Polytomous Items

Taehoon Kang1*, Allan S. Cohen2, and Hyun-Jung Sung3

1 University of California at Los Angeles
2 University of Georgia
3 Pearson

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tkang{at}cse.ucla.edu.


   Abstract
This study examines the utility of four indices for use in model selection with nested and non-nested polytomous IRT models: a cross-validation index and three information-based indices. Four commonly used polytomous IRT models are considered: the graded response model, the generalized partial credit model, the partial credit model, and the rating scale model. In a simulation study, comparisons among the four indices suggest that model selection is dependent to some extent on the particular conditions simulated. Overall, the BIC index appears to be most accurate in selecting the correct polytomous IRT model. Results are presented from analysis of a real data set to illustrate the use of the four indices for selecting an appropriate model.

First published on August 17, 2009
Applied Psychological Measurement 2009, doi:10.1177/0146621608331090


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?