Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bejar, I. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Application of the Continuous Response Level Model to Personality Measurement

Isaac I. Bejar

Department of Psychology, N660 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Road, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455

This paper reports an application of Samejima's latent trait model for continuous responses. A brief review of latent trait theory is presented, including an elaboration of the theory for test responses other than dichotomous responses, in order to put the continuous model in perspective. The model is then applied using the Impulsivity and Harmavoidance scales of Jackson's Personality Research Form. Special attention is given to the requirement that the model be invariant across populations and sex groups. Results showed that responses from males fit the model better than those from females, es pecially for the Harmavoidance scale. The practical and theoretical implications of the study are dis cussed.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 1, No. 4, 509-521 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/014662167700100407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
J. G. Baker, J. B. Rounds, and M. A. Zevon
A Comparison of Graded Response and Rasch Partial Credit Models with Subjective Well-Being
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2000; 25(3): 253 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]