Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greaud, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Green, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Equivalence of Conventional and Computer Presentation of Speed Tests

Valerie A. Greaud

The Johns Hopkins University

Bert F. Green

The Johns Hopkins University

This study examined the effects of computer pre sentation on speeded clerical tests. Two ratio scores— average number of correct responses per minute and its inverse, average number of seconds per correct re sponse—were examined as variants of the conven tional score, number of correct responses in a fixed in terval of time. Ratio scores were more reliable than number-correct scores and were less sensitive to test ing time. Tests administered on the computer were found to be at least as reliable as conventionally ad ministered tests, but examinees were much faster in the computer mode. Correlations between paper-and- pencil and computer modes were high, except when task differences were introduced by computer imple mentation.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 10, No. 1, 23-34 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168601000102
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AssessmentHome page
K. A. Campbell, D. S. Rohlman, D. Storzbach, L. M. Binder, W. K. Anger, C. A. Kovera, K. L. Davis, and S. J. Grossmann
Test-Retest Reliability of Psychological and Neurobehavioral Tests Self-Administered by Computer
Assessment, March 1, 1999; 6(1): 21 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
N. C. Silver, G. R. Phelps, and W. P. Dunlap
Baddeley's Grammatical Reasoning Test: active versus passive processing differences re-examined
Language Testing, December 1, 1989; 6(2): 164 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. J. Henly, K. J. Klebe, J. R. McBride, and R. Cudeck
Adaptive and Conventional Versions of the DAT: The First Complete Test Battery Comparison
Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1989; 13(4): 363 - 371.
[Abstract]