Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van de Vijver, F. J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Robustness of Rasch Estimates

Fons J. R. van de Vijver

Tilburg University

The small scale applicability of Rasch estimates was investigated under simulated conditions of guess ing and heterogeneity in item discrimination. The ac curacy of the Rasch estimates was evaluated by means of the correlation between the item/person parameters and their estimates, the standard deviations of the esti mates, and the difference as well as the root mean squared difference between parameters and estimates. Within the range of the present investigation (from 10 to 50 items and from 25 to 500 persons) these criteria yielded favorable results under conditions of heteroge neous item discrimination. Under conditions of guess ing, robustness could only be demonstrated for the correlational criterion. Guessing affects the difference measures between the parameter values and estimates quite strongly in a systematic way. It is argued that, notwithstanding these estimation errors, the Rasch model is to be preferred over nonstandard estimation procedures, from which the validity is unclear, or the use of the three-parameter model with its computa tional problems in small samples.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 10, No. 1, 45-57 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168601000104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?