This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Drasgow, F. Articles by Levine, M. V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Optimal Detection of Certain Forms of Inappropriate Test Scores

University of Illinois

Michael V. Levine

University of Illinois

Optimal appropriateness indices, recently introduced by Levine and Drasgow (1984), provide the highest rates of detection of aberrant response patterns that can be obtained from item responses. In this article they are used to study three important problems in ap propriateness measurement. First, the maximum detec tion rates of two particular forms of aberrance are de termined for a long unidimensional test. These detection rates are shown to be moderately high. Sec ond, two versions of the standardized l₀ appropriate ness index are compared to optimal indices. At low false alarm rates, one standardized l₀ index has detec tion rates that are about 65% as large as optimal for spuriously high (cheating) test scores. However, for the spuriously low scores expected from persons with ill-advised testing strategies or reading problems, both standardized l₀ indices are far from optimal. Finally, detection rates for polychotomous and dichotomous scorings of the item responses are compared. It is shown that dichotomous scoring causes serious de creases in the detectability of some aberrant response patterns. Consequently, appropriateness measurement constitutes one practical testing problem in which sig nificant gains result from the use of a polychotomous item response model.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 10, No. 1, 59-67 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168601000105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. McLeod, C. Lewis, and D. Thissen A Bayesian Method for the Detection of Item Preknowledge in Computerized Adaptive Testing Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 2003; 27(2): 121 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. O. Segall An Item Response Model for Characterizing Test Compromise Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2002; 27(2): 163 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. W. Noonan, M. W. Boss, and M. E. Gessaroli The Effect of Test Length and IRT Model on the Distribution and Stability of Three Appropriateness Indexes Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1992; 16(4): 345 - 352. [PDF]

				F. Drasgow, M. V. Levine, and M. E. McLaughlin Appropriateness Measurement for Some Multidimensional Test Batteries Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1991; 15(2): 171 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Drasgow, M. V. Levine, and M. E. McLaughlin Detecting Inappropriate Test Scores with Optimal and Practical Appropriateness Indices Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1987; 11(1): 59 - 79. [Abstract] [PDF]