Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gross, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fleischman, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Correction for Restriction of Range and Nonlinear Regressions: An Analytic Study

Alan L. Gross

City University of New York

Lynn E. Fleischman

City University of New York

The effect of a nonlinear regression function on the accuracy of the restriction of range correction formula was investigated using analytic methods. Expressions were derived for the expected mean square error (EMSE) of both the correction formula and the squared correlation computed in the selected group, with re spect to their use as estimators of the population rela tionship. The relative accuracy of these two estimators was then studied as a function of the form of the regression, the form of the marginal distribution of x scores, the strength of the relationship, sample size, and the degree of selection. Although the relative ac curacy of the correction formula was comparable for both linear and concave regression forms, the correc tion formula performed poorly when the regression form was convex. Further, even when the regression is linear or concave, it may not be advantageous to employ the correction formula unless the xy relation ship is strong and sample size is large.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 11, No. 2, 211-217 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168701100210


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?