Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birenbaum, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tatsuoka, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Open-Ended Versus Multiple-Choice Response Formats—It Does Make a Difference for Diagnostic Purposes

Menucha Birenbaum

Tel-Aviv University

Kikumi K. Tatsuoka

University of Illinois

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of response format—open-ended (OE) versus multiple-choice (Me)—on the diagnosis of examinee misconceptions in a procedural task. A test in fraction addition arithmetic was administered to 285 eighth- grade students, 148 of whom responded to the OE ver sion of the test and 137 to the MC version. The two datasets were compared with respect to the underlying structure of the test, the number of different error types, and the diagnosed sources of misconception (bugs) reflected in the response patterns. The overall results indicated considerable differences between the two formats, with more favorable results for the OE format.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 11, No. 4, 385-395 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168701100404
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
L. A. Shepard
Commentary on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Recommendations on Assessment
Educational Researcher, December 1, 2008; 37(9): 602 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am Educ Res JHome page
G. Nuthall and A. Alton-Lee
Assessing Classroom Learning: How Students Use Their Knowledge and Experience to Answer Classroom Achievement Test Questions in Science and Social Studies
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1995; 32(1): 185 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
M. Birenbaum and Y. Gutvirtz
The Relationship Between Test Anxiety and Seriousness of Errors in Algebra
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, March 1, 1993; 11(1): 12 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
M. Birenbaum, K. K. Tatsuoka, and Y. Gutvirtz
Effects of Response Format on Diagnostic Assessment of Scholastic Achievement
Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1992; 16(4): 353 - 363.
[PDF]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
H. van den Bergh
On the Construct Validity of Multiple- Choice Items for Reading Comprehension
Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1990; 14(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract]