Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Power and Robustness in Product-Moment Correlation

Robert L. Fowler

University of South Florida

The power of statistical tests based on four popular product-moment correlation coefficients was examined when relatively small samples (10 ≤ N ≤ 100) are drawn from bivariate populations of several different distributional shapes. Analytical procedures for deter mining theoretical power under conditions of bivariate normality are presented for the Pearson (rP), Spearman (rs), point-biserial (rpb), and phi (rfp) coefficients. A monte carlo study supported previous conclusions that t as a test of H 0: p = 0, with rP estimating p, is robust over a wide range of non-normality; however, frequent use of rs leads to greater power under identical distri butional assumption violations. The proportion of power due to Type III errors was also specified both analytically and empirically, and revealed the relative invulnerability of most statistical tests to directional misinterpretation.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 11, No. 4, 419-428 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168701100407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. L. Fowler
Using the Extreme Groups Strategy When Measures Are Not Normally Distributed
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1992; 16(3): 249 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]