Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Barmish, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Item Characteristics of Tests Constructed by Linear Programming

Frank B. Baker

University of Wisconsin

Alan S. Cohen

University of Wisconsin

B. Ross Barmish

University of Wisconsin

In the present paper, linear programming was used to select items from item pools based on one-, two-, and three-parameter models so that a target test infor mation function was reached. The primary interest was in the distributional characteristics of the items thus selected. The results suggest that the linear program ming approach focuses on the "worst feature" of the target information function (i.e., the extremes of a uniform target and the maximum of a peaked target). The values of the parameters of the selected items tend to form clusters. For uniform targets, these clus ters are associated with the extremes of the target range, whereas for peaked targets they are associated with the maximum of the target. Selecting items from an item pool by linear programming appears to be a useful addition to the test constructor's repertoire. However, additional refinement may be needed to ob tain a specific distribution of item parameters for a given test. Index terms: Item response theory, Item selection, Linear programming, Target informa tion function.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 12, No. 2, 189-199 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168801200208


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
I.-L. Wu
A New Computer Algorithm for Simultaneous Test Construction of Two-Stage and Multistage Testing
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2001; 26(2): 180 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
R. D. Armstrong, D. H. Jones, and Z. Wang
Optimization of Classical Reliability in Test Construction
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1998; 23(1): 1 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
M. P. F. Berger
A General Approach to Algorithmic Design of Fixed-Form Tests, Adaptive Tests, and Testlets
Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1994; 18(2): 141 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
R. D. Armstrong, D. H. Jones, and Z. Wang
Automated Parallel Test Construction Using Classical Test Theory
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1994; 19(1): 73 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. J. Adema
Methods and Models for the Construction of Weakly Parallel Tests
Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1992; 16(1): 53 - 63.
[Abstract]