This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Park, D.-G. Articles by Lautenschlager, G. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Improving IRT Item Bias Detection With Iterative Linking and Ability Scale Purification

University of Georgia

Gary J. Lautenschlager

University of Georgia

The effectiveness of several iterative methods of item response theory (IRT) item bias detection was examined in a simulation study. The situations em ployed were based on biased items created using a two-dimensional IRT model. Previous research demonstrated that the non-iterative application of some IRT parameter linking procedures produced unsatisfactory results in a simulation study involv ing unidirectional item bias. A modified form of Drasgow's iterative item parameter linking method and an adaptation of Lord's test purification procedure were examined in conditions that simu lated unidirectional and mixed-directional forms of item bias. The results illustrate that iterative link ing holds promise for differentiating biased from unbiased items under several item bias conditions. In addition, a combination of methods, involving cycles of iterative linking followed by ability scale purification, was found to be even more effective than iterative linking alone. This combination of procedures totally eliminated false positive misiden tifications for the most pervasive item bias condi tion, and false negative misidentifications were also reduced. Combining iterative linking with ability scale purification appears to be a viable method for analyzing multidimensional IRT data with unidimensional IRT item-bias methods.

Key Words: Index terms: ability scale purification • item bias • item response theory • iterative linking • iterative methods, metric linking • multidimensional IRT model.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. W. Meade, G. J. Lautenschlager, and E. C. Johnson A Monte Carlo Examination of the Sensitivity of the Differential Functioning of Items and Tests Framework for Tests of Measurement Invariance With Likert Data Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2007; 31(5): 430 - 455. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. F. French and S. J. Maller Iterative Purification and Effect Size Use With Logistic Regression for Differential Item Functioning Detection Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2007; 67(3): 373 - 393. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Macdonald and S. V. Paunonen A Monte Carlo Comparison of Item and Person Statistics Based on Item Response Theory versus Classical Test Theory Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2002; 62(6): 921 - 943. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Hidalgo-Montesinos and J. A. Lopez-Pina Two-Stage Equating in Differential Item Functioning Detection under the Graded Response Model with the Raju Area Measures and the Lord Statistic Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2002; 62(1): 32 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Donoghue and S. P. Isham A Comparison of Procedures to Detect Item Parameter Drift Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1998; 22(1): 33 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. D. Huang, A. T. Church, and M. S. Katigbak Identifying Cultural Differences in Items and Traits: Differential Item Functioning in the NEO Personality Inventory Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 1997; 28(2): 192 - 218. [Abstract]

				A. S. Cohen, S.-H. Kim, and J. A. Wollack An Investigation of the Likelihood Ratio Test For Detection of Differential Item Functioning Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1996; 20(1): 15 - 26. [Abstract]

				G. R. Budgell, N. S. Raju, and D. A. Quartetti Analysis of Differential Item Functioning in Translated Assessment Instruments Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1995; 19(4): 309 - 321. [Abstract]

				G. J. Lautenschlager, V. L. Flaherty, and D.-G. Park IRT Differential Item Functioning: An Examination of Ability Scale Purifications Educational and Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1994; 54(1): 21 - 31. [Abstract]

				R. E. Millsap and H. T. Everson Methodology Review: Statistical Approaches for Assessing Measurement Bias Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1993; 17(4): 297 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. S. Cohen and S.-H. Kim A Comparison of Lord's {chi}2 and Raju's Area Measures In Detection of DIF Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1993; 17(1): 39 - 52. [Abstract]

				M. D. Miller and T.C. Oshima Effect of Sample Size, Number of Biased Items, and Magnitude of Bias on a Two-Stage Item Bias Estimation Method Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1992; 16(4): 381 - 388. [PDF]

				T.C. Oshima and M. D. Miller Multidimensionality and Item Bias in Item Response Theory Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1992; 16(3): 237 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]