Applied Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roznowski, M.
Right arrow Articles by Humphreys, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 15, No. 2, 109-127 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169101500201

Three Approaches to Determining the Dimensionality of Binary Items

Mary Roznowski

Ohio State University

Ledyard R Tucker

University of Illinois

Lloyd G. Humphreys

University of Illinois

A monte carlo investigation of three approaches to assessing the dimensionality of binary items used a population model that allowed sampling of items and examinees and provided for variation and con trol of important parameters. The model was realistic of performance of binary items in current tests of cognitive abilities. Three indices were inves tigated : one based on the property of local indepen dence of unidimensional tests (the independence index), one based on patterns of second factor loadings derived from simplex theory (the pattern index), and one that reflects the shape of the curve of successive eigenvalues (the ratio of differences index). The last index was used for matrices of phi coefficients, tetrachoric correlations, and variances covariances. The local independence index reported here was the most accurate dimensionality index. The pattern index was accurate under many combi nations of parameters, but decreased substantially at the highest level of factor correlations and the widest dispersion of item difficulties. None of the eigenvalue indices produced satisfactory accuracy, except under the most favorable combinations of parameters. Nonetheless, the eigenvalues of variance-covariance matrices provided a more accurate basis for dimensionality decisions than tetrachoric correlations, which have been the statistic of choice of many investigators. Recommendations for use are also given.

Key Words: binary items • dimensionality • factor analysis • phi correlations • tetrachoric correlations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
R. Nandakumar and W. Stout
Refinements of Stout's Procedure for Assessing Latent Trait Unidimensionality
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1993; 18(1): 41 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]