Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cliff, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Investigation of Ordinal True Score Test Theory

John R. Donoghue

Educational Testing Service

Norman Cliff

University of Southern California

The validity of the assumptions underlying Cliff's (1989) ordinal true score theory (OTST) were investigated in a three-stage study. OTST makes only ordinal assumptions about the data, and provides a means of converting ordinal item information into summary ordinal information about examinees. Stage 1 was a simulation based on a classical (weak true score) test theory model. Stage 2 used a long empirical test to approximate the true order. Stage 3 was an extensive simulation based on the three-parameter logistic model. The results of all three studies were consistent; the assumption of local ordinal uncorrelatedness was violated in that partial item-item gamma (y) cor relations were positive instead of 0. The assump tion of proportional distribution of ties was violated—pairs tied on one item were not distributed on the other as prescribed. The item- true order tau ({tau}) correlation was consistently overestimated, although the estimated {tau} correlated highly with the true {tau}. The {tau} correlation between total score and true order was also consistently overestimated. Stage 3 showed that these effects occurred under all conditions, although they were smaller under some conditions.

Key Words: Index terms: classical test theory • item response models • local independence • monte carlo simulation • nonparametric test models • ordinal regression • ordinal test models, test theory.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 15, No. 4, 335-351 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169101500403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. M. Woods
Testing for Differential Item Functioning With Measures of Partial Association
Applied Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2009; 33(7): 538 - 554.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. R. Meijer, K. Sijtsma, and I. W. Molenaar
Reliability Estimation for Single Dichotomous Items Based on Mokken's IRT Model
Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1995; 19(4): 323 - 335.
[Abstract]