This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Reckase, M. D. Articles by McKinley, R. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Discriminating Power of Items That Measure More Than One Dimension

American College Testing

Robert L. McKinley

Educational Testing Service

Determining a correct response to many test items frequently requires more than one ability. This paper describes the characteristics of items of this type by proposing generalizations of the item response theory concepts of discrimination and information. The conceptual framework for these statistics is presented, and the formulas for the statistics are derived for the multidimensional extension of the two-parameter logistic model. Use of the statistics is demonstrated for a form of the ACT Mathematics Usage Test.

Key Words: Index terms: item discrimination • item information • item response theory • multidimensional item response theory.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 15, No. 4, 361-373 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169101500407


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Levy, R. J. Mislevy, and S. Sinharay Posterior Predictive Model Checking for Multidimensionality in Item Response Theory Applied Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2009; 33(7): 519 - 537. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. F. Furlow, T. Raiford Ross, and P. Gagne The Impact of Multidimensionality on the Detection of Differential Bundle Functioning Using Simultaneous Item Bias Test Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2009; 33(6): 441 - 464. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. J. Ferrando Difficulty, Discrimination, and Information Indices in the Linear Factor Analysis Model for Continuous Item Responses Applied Psychological Measurement, January 1, 2009; 33(1): 9 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Bo Zhang and C. A. Stone Evaluating Item Fit for Multidimensional Item Response Models Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2008; 68(2): 181 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. E. DeMars ``Guessing'' Parameter Estimates for Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2007; 67(3): 433 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Yao and R. D. Schwarz A Multidimensional Partial Credit Model With Associated Item and Test Statistics: An Application to Mixed-Format Tests Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2006; 30(6): 469 - 492. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Martineau Distorting Value Added: The Use of Longitudinal, Vertically Scaled Student Achievement Data for Growth-Based, Value-Added Accountability Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2006; 31(1): 35 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Kahraman and A. Kamata Increasing the Precision of Subscale Scores by Using Out-of-Scale Information Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2004; 28(6): 407 - 426. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. A. H. van Abswoude, L. A. van der Ark, and K. Sijtsma A Comparative Study of Test Data Dimensionality Assessment Procedures Under Nonparametric IRT Models Applied Psychological Measurement, January 1, 2004; 28(1): 3 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Bolt and V. F. Lall Estimation of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Multidimensional Item Response Models Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2003; 27(6): 395 - 414. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Tate A Comparison of Selected Empirical Methods for Assessing the Structure of Responses to Test Items Applied Psychological Measurement, May 1, 2003; 27(3): 159 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. E. Seraphine The Performance of Dimtest When Latent Trait and Item Difficulty Distributions Differ Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 2000; 24(1): 82 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. J. van der Linden Multidimensional Adaptive Testing with a Minimum Error-Variance Criterion Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1999; 24(4): 398 - 412. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. HATTIE, R. M. JAEGER, and L. BOND Chapter 11 : Persistent Methodological Questions in Educational Testing Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1999; 24(1): 393 - 446. [PDF]

				K. M. Mazor, R. K. Hambleton, and B. E. Clauser Multidimensional DIF Analyses: The Effects of Matching on Unidimensional Subtest Scores Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1998; 22(4): 357 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Adams, M. Wilson, and W.-c. Wang The Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1997; 21(1): 1 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Reckase The Past and Future of Multidimensional Item Response Theory Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1997; 21(1): 25 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Ackerman Graphical Representation of Multidimensional Item Response Theory Analyses Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1996; 20(4): 311 - 329. [Abstract]

				B. T. Hemker, K. Sijtsma, and I. W. Molenaar Selection of Unidimensional Scales From a Multidimensional Item Bank in the Polytomous Mokken I RT Model Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1995; 19(4): 337 - 352. [Abstract]

				E. Muraki and J. E. Carlson Full-Information Factor Analysis for Polytomous Item Responses Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1995; 19(1): 73 - 90.

				T. A. Ackerman and J. A. Evans The Influence of Conditioning Scores In Performing DIF Analyses Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1994; 18(4): 329 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. A. Ackerman Creating a Test Information Profile for a Two-Dimensional Latent Space Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1994; 18(3): 257 - 275. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Millsap and H. T. Everson Methodology Review: Statistical Approaches for Assessing Measurement Bias Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1993; 17(4): 297 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R.-M. Batley and M. W. Boss The Effects on Parameter Estimation of Correlated Dimensions and a Distribution-Restricted Trait in a Multidimensional Item Response Model Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1993; 17(2): 131 - 141. [Abstract]

				T.C. Oshima and M. D. Miller Multidimensionality and Item Bias in Item Response Theory Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1992; 16(3): 237 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. Luecht and T. R. Miller Unidimensional Calibrations and Interpretations of Composite Traits for Multidimensional Tests Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1992; 16(3): 279 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF]