Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luecht, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hirsch, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Item Selection Using an Average Growth Approximation of Target Information Functions

Richard M. Luecht

American College Testing

Thomas M. Hirsch

American College Testing

The derivations of several item selection algorithms for use in fitting test items to target information functions (IFS) are described. These algorithms circumvent iterative solutions by using the criteria of moving averages of the distance to a target IF and by simultaneously considering an entire range of ability points used to condition the IFS. The algorithms were tested by generating six forms of an ACT math test, each fit to an existing target test, including content-designated item sub sets. The results indicate that the algorithms pro vided reliable fit to the target in terms of item parameters, test information functions, and expected score distributions.

Key Words: Index terms: com puterized testing • information functions • item informa tion • parallel tests • test construction • test information

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 16, No. 1, 41-51 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169201600104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. M. Luecht
Book Review: van der Lindel, W.J. (2005). Linear Models for Optimal Test Design. New York: Springer, 408 pp
Applied Psychological Measurement, May 1, 2009; 33(3): 238 - 243.
[PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. I. Belov and R. D. Armstrong
Monte Carlo Test Assembly for Item Pool Analysis and Extension
Applied Psychological Measurement, July 1, 2005; 29(4): 239 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
I.-L. Wu
A New Computer Algorithm for Simultaneous Test Construction of Two-Stage and Multistage Testing
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2001; 26(2): 180 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. J. Van Der Linden
Optimal Assembly of Tests with Item Sets
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2000; 24(3): 225 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. J. van der Linden,
Optimal Assembly of Psychological and Educational Tests
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1998; 22(3): 195 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. M. Luecht
Computer-Assisted Test Assembly Using Optimization Heuristics
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1998; 22(3): 224 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. J. van der Linden
Assembling Tests for the Measurement of Multiple Traits
Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1996; 20(4): 373 - 388.
[Abstract]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. M. Luecht
Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing in a Certification or Licensure Context
Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1996; 20(4): 389 - 404.
[Abstract]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
R.D. Armstrong, D.H. Jones, Xuan Li, and I.-L. Wu
A Study of a Network-Flow Algorithm and a Noncorrecting Algorithm for Test Assembly
Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1996; 20(1): 89 - 98.
[Abstract]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
L. Swanson and M. L. Stocking
A Model and Heuristic For Solving Very Large Item Selection Problems
Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1993; 17(2): 151 - 166.
[Abstract]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
R. M. Luecht and T. R. Miller
Unidimensional Calibrations and Interpretations of Composite Traits for Multidimensional Tests
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1992; 16(3): 279 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]