This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Oshima, T.C. Articles by Miller, M. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Multidimensionality and Item Bias in Item Response Theory

Georgia State University

M. David Miller

University of Florida

This paper demonstrates empirically how item bias indexes based on item response theory (IRT) identify bias that results from multidimensionality. When a test is multidimensional (MD) with a primary trait and a nuisance trait that affects a small portion of the test, item bias is defined as a mean difference on the nuisance trait between two groups. Results from a simulation study showed that although IRT-based bias indexes clearly distinguished multidimensionality from item bias, even with the presence of a between-group dif ference on the primary trait, the bias detection rate depended on the degree to which the item measured the nuisance trait, the values of MD discrimination, and the number of MD items. It was speculated that bias defined from the MD perspective was more likely to be detected when the test data met the essential unidimensionality assumption. Index

Key Words: terms: item bias • multidimensionality • item response theory • item bias • mean differences • multidimensionality; multidimensionality • mean differences in IRT.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 16, No. 3, 237-248 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169201600304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Mazor, R. K. Hambleton, and B. E. Clauser Multidimensional DIF Analyses: The Effects of Matching on Unidimensional Subtest Scores Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1998; 22(4): 357 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Miller and T.C. Oshima Effect of Sample Size, Number of Biased Items, and Magnitude of Bias on a Two-Stage Item Bias Estimation Method Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1992; 16(4): 381 - 388. [PDF]