This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Millsap, R. E. Articles by Meredith, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Inferential Conditions in the Statistical Detection of Measurement Bias

City University of New York

William Meredith

University of California, Berkeley

Measurement bias in an observed variable Y as a measure of an unobserved variable W exists when the relationship of Y to W varies among popula tions of interest. Bias is often studied by examin ing population differences in the relationship of Y to a second observed measure Z that serves as a substitute for W. Whether the results of such studies have implications for measurement bias is addressed by first defining two forms of invariance— one corresponding to the relationship of Y to the unmeasured W, and one corresponding to the rela tionship of Y to the observed Z. General theoreti cal conditions are provided that justify the inference of one form of invariance from the other. The implications of these conditions for bias detection in two broad areas of application are discussed: differential item functioning and predictive bias in employment and educational settings. It is con cluded that the conditions for inference are restric tive, and that bias investigations that rely strictly on observed measures are not, in general, diag nostic of measurement bias or the lack of bias. Some alternative approaches to bias detection are discussed. Index terms: differential item function ing, invariance, item bias, item response theory, measurement bias, predictive bias.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 16, No. 4, 389-402 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169201600411


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. D. Penfield, N. D. Myers, and E. W. Wolfe Methods for Assessing Item, Step, and Threshold Invariance in Polytomous Items Following the Partial Credit Model Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2008; 68(5): 717 - 733. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. D. Penfield Three Classes of Nonparametric Differential Step Functioning Effect Estimators Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2008; 32(6): 480 - 501. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Douglas, W. Stout, and L. V. DiBello A Kernel-Smoothed Version of SIBTEST With Applications to Local DIF Inference and Function Estimation Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1996; 21(4): 333 - 363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Uttaro and R. E. Millsap Factors Influencing the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure the Detection of Differential Item Functioning Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1994; 18(1): 15 - 25. [PDF]

				R. E. Millsap and H. T. Everson Methodology Review: Statistical Approaches for Assessing Measurement Bias Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1993; 17(4): 297 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]