Applied Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Ayala, R.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 18, No. 2, 155-170 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169401800205

The Influence of Multidimensionality on the Graded Response Model

R.J. De Ayala

University of Maryland

Most item response theory models assume a uni-dimensional latent space. This study extended previous work on the effects of dimensionality on parameter estimation for dichotomous models to the polytomous graded response model. A multidimensional graded response model was developed to generate data in one, two, and three dimensions. The two- and three-dimension conditions contained datasets that varied in their interdimensional association. The effects of test length and the ratio of sample size to the number of item parameters estimated also were investigated. For the unidimensional data, a sample size ratio of 5:1 provided reasonably accurate estimation; increasing test length from 15 to 30 items did not have a significant impact on the accuracy of item parameter estimation. Regardless of the dimensionality of the data, the difficulty parameters were well estimated. For the multidimensional data, the correlations between the estimated item discrimination and the average (as well as the sum of the) dimensional discrimination were greater than the correlations between the estimated item discrimination and the individual dimensional discriminations. Fidelity coefficients between the mean trait level and the trait level estimate ({theta}) were greater than those between {theta} and the latent traits. The impact of equating on accuracy indexes in a multidimensional context is discussed. Index terms: dimensionality, graded response model, IRT, marginal maximum likelihood estimation, polytomous models.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
L. Kirisci, T.-c. Hsu, and L. Yu
Robustness of Item Parameter Estimation Programs to Assumptions of Unidimensionality and Normality
Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2001; 25(2): 146 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
P. J. Ferrando
Likert Scaling Using Continuous, Censored, and Graded Response Models: Effects on Criterion-Related Validity
Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1999; 23(2): 161 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
M. R. Harwell
Analyzing the Results of Monte Carlo Studies in Item Response Theory
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1997; 57(2): 266 - 279.
[Abstract]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
M. Harwell, C. A. Stone, T.-C. Hsu, and L. Kirisci
Monte Carlo Studies in Item Response Theory
Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1996; 20(2): 101 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]