Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Humphreys, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Search for a Common Factor Model to Describe a Cross-Lagged Correlation Difference

Lloyd G. Humphreys

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Charles K. Parsons

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

This study describes the development of a com mon factor model for a cross-lagged difference in volving a measure of aural comprehension and an intellectual composite. The direction of the dif ference was that the Listening Test predicted the composite more accurately than the composite pre dicted the Listening Test. A complex model which allowed seemingly identical common factors ap pearing at different ages to be highly, but imper fectly, correlated fit the 32 x 32 table of intercorre lations of 16 variables measured at each of two time periods. The model also described quite accurately the multiple correlations on which the cross-lagged difference was based. Aural compre hension at grade 5 was equidistant from the vectors of the two general factors at grades 5 and 11; but aural comprehension at grade 11, while close to the general factor at grade 11, was outside the space created by the two general factor vectors. Individual differences in aural comprehension anticipated by several years changes in rank on the general factor as defined by standard tests.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 2, No. 2, 257-267 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014662167800200208


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?