This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Velicer, W. F. Articles by Stevenson, J. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Relation Between Item Format and the Structure of the Eysenck Personality Inventory

University of Rhode Island

John F. Stevenson

University of Rhode Island

A Likert seven-choice response format for per sonality inventories allows finer distinctions by sub jects than the traditional two-choice format. The Eysenck Personality Inventory was employed in the present study to test the hypothesis that use of the expanded format would result in a clearer and more accurate indication of test structure. The sub jects, volunteers in a psychology course, took the standard two-choice version of the EPI and a seven- choice version one week apart, with the order counter-balanced. A principal components analysis with a varimax rotation yielded two components for the two-choice format, clearly identifiable as Eysenck's "Neuroticism" and "Extraversion" which together accounted for 18% of the variance. The seven-choice version resulted in six components ac counting for 46% of the variance. The expanded format suggested inadequacies in the structure of the EPI, defined the factor structure more clearly, and explained a greater proportion of the variance. It thus demonstrated the apparent advantages of the multiple-response format for scale construction.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 2, No. 2, 293-304 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014662167800200210


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. V. Paunonen, M. Zeidner, H. A. Engvik, P. Oosterveld, and R. Maliphant The Nonverbal Assessment of Personality in Five Cultures Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2000; 31(2): 220 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Lei Chang A Psychometric Evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-Type Scales in Relation to Reliability and Validity Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1994; 18(3): 205 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Windle and R. M. Lerner Reassessing the Dimensions of Temperamental Individuality Across the Life Span:The Revised Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS-R) Journal of Adolescent Research, April 1, 1986; 1(2): 213 - 229. [Abstract]

				W. F. Velicer, C. C. Diclemente, and D. P. Corriveau Item Format and the Structure of the Personal Orientation Inventory Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1984; 8(4): 409 - 419. [Abstract]

				L. A. King, D. W. King, and A. J. Klockars Dichotomous and Multipoint Scales Using Bipolar Adjectives Applied Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1983; 7(2): 173 - 180. [Abstract]

				A. L. Comrey and I. Montag Comparison of Factor Analytic Results with Two-Choice and Seven-Choice Personality Item Formats Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1982; 6(3): 285 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF]