Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Factor Analysis of the WAIS and Twenty French-Kit Reference Tests

Philip H. Ramsey

Hofstra University

Over a 3-year period, 20 reference tests were given to 114 undergraduate students ranging in age from 18 to 46. The WAIS was given to 107 of the students. Maximum likelihood factor analysis was performed on the 31-variable correlation matrix formed by the 11 WAIS subscales and 20 reference tests. A maximum likelihood test of significance supported the hypothesis of 10 factors. Significant split-sample factor reliabilities and WAIS subscale loadings were found on all 10 factors. The rotated factors in order of explained variance were Verbal Comprehension, Visualization, Memory Span, Syllogistic Reasoning, General Reasoning, Induc tion, Mechanical Knowledge, Number Facility, Spa tial Orientation, and Associative Memory. The apparent contradictions between many previous analyses of the WAIS are discussed and a unified interpretation is presented.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 2, No. 4, 505-517 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014662167800200405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?