Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitely, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Individual Inconsistency: Implications for Test Reliability and Behavioral Predictability

Susan E. Whitely

University of Kansas

The nature of individual inconsistency in per formance on trait measurements is an important topic in psychometrics because of its direct rele vance to measurement reliability. Several studies have supported short-term inconsistency as a sys tematic source of variation among individuals by finding some evidence for generalizability and rela tionship to behavioral predictability. However, these findings are questionable, since these studies con founded change with short-term fluctuation in their response inconsistency measure. The current re search separates these two sources of inconsistency in a reanalysis of the data from one major study on short-term consistency and finds little evidence for generalizability or a relationship to behavioral pre dictability. These results support the popular as sumption that measurement error from short-term fluctuations is not due to systematic individual dif ferences in response consistency, as well as sup porting a more limited definition of the individual inconsistency construct.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 2, No. 4, 571-579 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014662167800200412


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?