This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Claudy, J. G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Multiple Regression and Validity Estimation in One Sample

American Institutes for Research

This study empirically investigated equations for estimating the value of the multiple correlation co efficient in the population underlying a sample and the value of the population validity coefficient of a sample regression equation. In addition to pre viously published estimation equations, several new procedures, including an empirically derived equa tion, were evaluated using 16 independent popula tions. Overall, the empirical equation was superior to any of the previously published estimation proce dures. It appears that cross-validation may no longer be necessary for certain purposes.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 2, No. 4, 595-607 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014662167800200414


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Shieh Improved Shrinkage Estimation of Squared Multiple Correlation Coefficient and Squared Cross-Validity Coefficient Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 387 - 407. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. F. Alf Jr. and R. G. Graf A New Maximum Likelihood Estimator for the Population Squared Multiple Correlation Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2002; 27(3): 223 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. S. Raju, R. Bilgic, J. E. Edwards, and P. F. Fleer Accuracy of Population Validity and Cross-Validity Estimation: An Empirical Comparison of Formula-Based, Traditional Empirical, and Equal Weights Procedures Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1999; 23(2): 99 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. H. St. John and P. L. Roth The Impact of Cross-Validation Adjustments on Estimates of Effect Size in Business Policy and Strategy Research Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 1999; 2(2): 157 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. S. Raju, R. Bilgic, J. E. Edwards, and P. F. Fleer Methodology Review: Estimation of Population Validity and Cross-Validity, and the Use of Equal Weights in Prediction Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1997; 21(4): 291 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Kennedy Estimation of the Squared Cross-Validity Coefficient in the Context of Best Subset Regression Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1988; 12(3): 231 - 237. [Abstract]

				K. L. Cotter and N. S. Raju An Evaluation of Formula-Based Population Squared Cross-Validity Estimates and Factor Score Estimates in Prediction Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1982; 42(2): 493 - 519. [Abstract]

				W. W. Rozeboom The Cross-Validational Accuracy of Sample Regressions Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1981; 6(2): 179 - 198. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Huberty and S. A. Mourad Estimation in Multiple Correlation/Prediction Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1980; 40(1): 101 - 112. [Abstract]

				F. Drasgow, N. J. Dorans, and L. R. Tucker Estimators of the Squared Cross-Validity Coefficient: A Monte Carlo Investigation Applied Psychological Measurement, July 1, 1979; 3(3): 387 - 399. [Abstract]