Applied Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wollack, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 20, No. 1, 15-26 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169602000102

An Investigation of the Likelihood Ratio Test For Detection of Differential Item Functioning

Allan S. Cohen

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Seock-Ho Kim

University of Georgia

James A. Wollack

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Type I error rates for the likelihood ratio test for de tecting differential item functioning (DIF) were investi gated using monte carlo simulations. Two- and three-parameter item response theory (IRT) models were used to generate 100 datasets of a 50-item test for samples of 250 and 1,000 simulated examinees for each IRT model. Item parameters were estimated by marginal maximum likelihood for three IRT models: the three-parameter model, the three-parameter model with a fixed guessing parameter, and the two-parameter model. All DIF comparisons were simulated by ran domly pairing two samples from each sample size and IRT model condition so that, for each sample size and IRT model condition, there were 50 pairs of reference and focal groups. Type I error rates for the two-param eter model were within theoretically expected values at each of the {alpha} levels considered. Type I error rates for the three-parameter and three-parameter model with a fixed guessing parameter, however, were different from the theoretically expected values at the {alpha} levels considered.

Key Words: Index terms: bias • differential item func tioning • item bias • item response theory • likelihood ra tio test for DIF.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W. Holmes Finch and B. F. French
Detection of Crossing Differential Item Functioning: A Comparison of Four Methods
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2007; 67(4): 565 - 582.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W.-C. Wang and M. Wilson
Assessment of Differential Item Functioning in Testlet-Based Items Using the Rasch Testlet Model
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2005; 65(4): 549 - 576.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
H. Finch
The MIMIC Model as a Method for Detecting DIF: Comparison With Mantel-Haenszel, SIBTEST, and the IRT Likelihood Ratio
Applied Psychological Measurement, July 1, 2005; 29(4): 278 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
W. Van den Noortgate and P. De Boeck
Assessing and Explaining Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Mixed Models
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2005; 30(4): 443 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
A. W. Meade and G. J. Lautenschlager
A Comparison of Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analytic Methodologies for Establishing Measurement Equivalence/Invariance
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2004; 7(4): 361 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
W.-C. Wang and Y.-L. Yeh
Effects of Anchor Item Methods on Differential Item Functioning Detection with the Likelihood Ratio Test
Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2003; 27(6): 479 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. J. Maller
Differential Item Functioning in the Wisc-III: Item Parameters for Boys and Girls in the National Standardization Sample
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2001; 61(5): 793 - 817.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
J. A. Teresi, M. Kleinman, K. Ocepek-Welikson, M. Ramirez, B. Gurland, R. Lantigua, and D. Holmes
Applications of Item Response Theory to the Examination of the Psychometric Properties and Differential Item Functioning of the Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation Dementia Diagnostic Scale among Samples of Latino, African American, and White Non-Latino Elderly
Research on Aging, November 1, 2000; 22(6): 738 - 773.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
S.-H. Kim and A. S. Cohen
Detection of Differential Item Functioning Under the Graded Response Model With the Likelihood Ratio Test
Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1998; 22(4): 345 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]