Applied Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deville, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Prometric, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 20, No. 2, 127-139 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169602000202

An Empirical Link of Content and Construct Validity Evidence

Craig W. Deville

Sylvain Prometric

2601 W. 88th Street, Bloomington MN 55431, U.S.A.

Since the 1940s, measurement specialists have called for an empirical validation technique that combines con tent- and construct-related evidence. This study investi gated the value of such a technique. A self-assessment instrument designed to cover four traditional foreign language skills was administered to 1,404 college-level foreign language students. Four subject-matter experts were asked to provide item dissimilarity judgments, us ing whatever criteria they thought appropriate. The data from the students and the experts were examined sepa rately using multidimensional scaling followed by clus ter and discriminant analyses. Results showed that the structure of the data underlying both the student and ex pert scaling solutions corresponded closely to that speci fied in the instrument blueprint. In addition, using canonical correlation, a comparison of the two scaling solutions revealed a high degree of similarity in the two solutions.

Key Words: Index terms: canonical correlation • con struct validity • content validity • item dissimilarities data, multidimensional scaling.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?