This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Roberts, J. S. Articles by Laughlin, J. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Unidimensional Item Response Model for Unfolding Responses From a Graded Disagree-Agree Response Scale

Medical University of South Carolina, Center for Drug and Alcohol Programs (CDAP), Institute of Psychiatry, 472 North, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston SC 29425, U.S.A.

James E. Laughlin

Medical University of South Carolina, Center for Drug and Alcohol Programs (CDAP), Institute of Psychiatry, 472 North, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston SC 29425, U.S.A.

Binary or graded disagree-agree responses to atti tude items are often collected for the purpose of attitude measurement. Although such data are sometimes ana lyzed with cumulative measurement models, recent studies suggest that unfolding models are more appro priate (Roberts, 1995; van Schuur & Kiers, 1994). Ad vances in item response theory (IRT) have led to the development of several parametric unfolding models for binary data (Andrich, 1988; Andrich & Luo, 1993; Hoijtink, 1991); however, IRT models for unfolding graded responses have not been proposed. A parametric IRT model for unfolding either binary or graded re sponses is developed here. The graded unfolding model (GUM) is a generalization of Andrich & Luo's hyperbolic cosine model for binary data. A joint maximum likeli hood procedure was implemented to estimate GUM pa rameters, and a subsequent recovery simulation showed that reasonably accurate estimates could be obtained with minimal data demands (e.g., as few as 100 respon dents and 15 to 20 six-category items). The applicability of the GUM to common attitude testing situations is illus trated with real data on student attitudes toward capital punishment. Index terms: attitude measurement, graded unfolding model, hyperbolic cosine model, ideal point process, item response theory, Likert scale, Thur stone scale, unfolding model, unidimensional scaling.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 20, No. 3, 231-255 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169602000305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. D. Penfield Estimating the Standard Error of the Maximum Likelihood Ability Estimator in Adaptive Testing Using the Posterior-Weighted Test Information Function Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2007; 67(6): 958 - 975. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Anderson Koenig and J. S. Roberts Linking Parameters Estimated With the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model: A Comparison of the Accuracy of Characteristic Curve Methods Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2007; 31(6): 504 - 524. [Abstract] [PDF]