Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sijtsma, K.
Right arrow Articles by Verweij, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Knowledge of Solution Strategies and IRT Modeling of Items for Transitive Reasoning

Klaas Sijtsma

Tilburg Universityk.sijtsma{at}kub.nl

Anton C. Verweij

Vrije Universiteit

Componential item response theory (CIRT) is presented as a model-oriented approach to studying processes and strategies underlying the incorrect/correct responses to cognitive test tasks. CIRT is contrasted with a data-oriented approach in which verbal explanations for incorrect/correct responses are collected during the test phase and incorporated in the scoring. Alternatively, the psychologically meaningful data are modeled by unidimensional item response theory models. Verbal explanations for each examinee and task were collected from transitive reasoning tasks in addition to the incorrect/correct responses. Two datasets were compiled, one reflecting the common incorrect/correct scoring and one showing whether a deductive strategy had been used to produce a correct response. The Mokken model of monotone homogeneity, the partial-credit model, and the generalized one-parameter logistic model were used to analyze both polytomous datasets. Results showed that combining knowledge of solution strategies with IRT modeling produced a useful unidimensional scale for transitive reasoning.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 23, No. 1, 55-68 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/01466219922031194


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. W. Junker and K. Sijtsma
Nonparametric Item Response Theory in Action: An Overview of the Special Issue
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2001; 25(3): 211 - 220.
[PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. W. Junker and K. Sijtsma
Cognitive Assessment Models with Few Assumptions, and Connections with Nonparametric Item Response Theory
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2001; 25(3): 258 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]