Applied Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Junker, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sijtsma, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 24, No. 1, 65-81 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/01466216000241004

Latent and Manifest Monotonicity in Item Response Models

Brian W. Junker

Carnegie Mellon Universitybrian{at}stat.cmu.edu

Klaas Sijtsma

Tilburg University

The monotonicity of item response functions(IRF) is a central feature of most parametric andnonparametric item response models. Monotonicityallows items to be interpreted as measuring a trait,and it allows for a general theory of nonparametricinference for traits. This theory is based on monotonelikelihood ratio and stochastic ordering properties.Thus, confirming the monotonicity assumption isessential to applications of nonparametric itemresponse models. The results of two methods ofevaluating monotonicity are presented: regressingindividual item scores on the total test score andon the ‘rest’ score, which is obtained by omittingthe selected item from the total test score. It wasfound that the item-total regressions of some familiardichotomous item response models with monotoneIRFs exhibited nonmonotonicities that persist as thetest length increased. However, item-rest regressionsnever exhibited nonmonotonicities under the nonparametricmonotone unidimensional item responsemodel. The implications of these results for exploratoryanalysis of dichotomous item response dataand the application of these results to polytomousitem response data are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
G. Karabatsos and C.-F. Sheu
Order-Constrained Bayes Inference for Dichotomous Models of Unidimensional Nonparametric IRT
Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 2004; 28(2): 110 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
E. De Koning, K. Sijtsma, and J. H. M. Hamers
Comparison of Four IRT Models When Analyzing Two Tests for Inductive Reasoning
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2002; 26(3): 302 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. W. Junker and K. Sijtsma
Nonparametric Item Response Theory in Action: An Overview of the Special Issue
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2001; 25(3): 211 - 220.
[PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Habing
Nonparametric Regression and the Parametric Bootstrap for Local Dependence Assessment
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2001; 25(3): 221 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. W. Junker and K. Sijtsma
Cognitive Assessment Models with Few Assumptions, and Connections with Nonparametric Item Response Theory
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2001; 25(3): 258 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]