This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hanson, B. A. Articles by Béguin, A. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Obtaining a Common Scale for Item Response Theory Item Parameters Using Separate Versus Concurrent Estimation in the Common-Item Equating Design

CTB/McGraw-Hillbhanson{at}ctb.com.

Anton A. Béguin

University of Twente

Item response theory item parameters can be estimated using data from a common-item equating design either separately for each form or concurrently across forms. This paper reports the results of a simulation study of separate versus concurrent item parameter estimation. Using simulated data from a test with 60 dichotomous items, four factors were considered: (a) estimation program (MULTILOG versus BILOG-MG), (b) sample size per form (3,000 versus 1,000), (c) number of common items (20 versus 10), and (d) equivalent versus nonequivalent groups taking the two forms (no mean difference versus a mean difference of 1 SD). In addition, four methods of item parameter scaling were used in the separate estimation condition: two item characteristic curve methods (Stocking-Lord and Haebara) and two moment methods (Mean/Mean and Mean/Sigma). Concurrent estimation generally resulted in lower error than separate estimation, although not universally so. The results suggest that one factor accounting for the lower error when using concurrent estimation may be that the parameter estimates for the common item parameters are based on larger samples. It is argued that the results of this study, together with other research on this topic, are not sufficient to recommend completely avoiding separate estimation in favor of concurrent estimation.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Huiqin Hu, W. T. Rogers, and Z. Vukmirovic Investigation of IRT-Based Equating Methods in the Presence of Outlier Common Items Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2008; 32(4): 311 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Kim and M. J. Kolen Effects on Scale Linking of Different Definitions of Criterion Functions for the IRT Characteristic Curve Methods Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, December 1, 2007; 32(4): 371 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]