Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, C. W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Method for Analyzing Sparse Data Matrices in the Generalizability Theory Framework

Christopher W. T. Chiu

Law School Admission Council, Newtown, PA

Edward W. Wolfe

Michigan State University, East Lansing

In generalizability analyses, unstable, and potentially invalid, variance component estimates may result from using only a limited portion of available data. However, missing observations are common in operational performance assessment settings because of the nature of the assessment design. This article describes a procedure for overcoming the computational and technological limitations in analyzing data with missing observations by extracting data from a sparsely .lled data matrix into analyzable smaller subsets of data. This subdividing method is accomplished by creating data sets that exhibit structural designs that are common in generalizability analyses, namely, the crossed, MBIB, and nested designs. The validity of this subdividing method is examined using a Monte Carlo simulation. The method is demonstrated on an operational data set.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 26, No. 3, 321-338 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0146621602026003006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Language TestingHome page
Xiaoming Xi
Evaluating analytic scoring for the TOEFL(R) Academic Speaking Test (TAST) for operational use
Language Testing, April 1, 2007; 24(2): 251 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]