Applied Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 26, No. 4, 412-432 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/014662102237797

Estimating Consistency and Accuracy Indices for Multiple Classifications

Won-Chan Lee

ACT, Inc.leew{at}act.org

Bradley A. Hanson

CTB/McGraw-Hillbhanson{at}ctb.com

Robert L. Brennan

University of Iowarobert-brennan{at}uiowa.edu.

This article describes procedures for estimating various indices of classification consistency and accuracy for multiple category classifications using data from a single test administration. The estimates of the classification consistency and accuracy indices are compared under three different psychometric models: the two-parameter beta binomial, four-parameter beta binomial, and three-parameter logistic IRT (item response theory) models. Using real data sets, the estimation procedures are illustrated, and the characteristics of the estimated classification indices are examined. This article also examines the behavior of the estimated classification indices as a function of the latent variable. All three components of the models (i.e., the estimated true score distributions, fitted observed score distributions, and estimated conditional error variances) appear to have considerable influence on the magnitudes of the estimated classification indices. Choosing a model in practice should be based on various considerations including the degree of model fit to the data, suitability of the model assumptions, and the computational feasibility.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
Hyun Sook Yi, S. Kim, and R. L. Brennan
A Method for Estimating Classification Consistency Indices for Two Equated Forms
Applied Psychological Measurement, July 1, 2007; 31(4): 275 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
T. M. Bechger, G. Maris, H. H. F. M. Verstralen, and A. A. Beguin
Using Classical Test Theory in Combination with Item Response Theory
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2003; 27(5): 319 - 334.
[Abstract] [PDF]