Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emons, W. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sijtsma, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Person Fit in Order-Restricted Latent Class Models

Wilco H. M. Emons

w.h.m.emons{at}uvt.nl

Cees A. W. Glas

Rob R. Meijer

Universityof Twente, The Netherlands

Klaas Sijtsma

Tilburg University, The Netherlands

Person-fit analysis revolves around fitting an item response theory (IRT) model to respondents’ vectors of item scores on a test and drawing statistical inferences about fit or misfit of these vectors. Four person-fit measures were studied in order-restricted latent class models (OR-LCMs). To decide whether the OR-LCM fits an item score vector, a Bayesian framework was adopted and posterior predictive checks were used. First, simulated Type I error rates and detection rates were investigated for the four person-fit measures under varying test and item characteristics. Second, the suitability of the OR-LCM methodology in a nonparametric IRT context was investigated. The result was Type I error rates close to the nominal Type I error rates and detection rates close to the detection rates found in OR-LCMs. This means that the OR-LCM methodology is a suitable alternative for assessing person fit in nonparametric IRT models.

Key Words: Bayesian approach to person fit • nonparametric item response theory • order-restricted latent class analysis • person-fit analysis • person-fit statistics • posterior predictive checks

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 27, No. 6, 459-478 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0146621603259270


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. St-Onge, P. Valois, B. Abdous, and S. Germain
A Monte Carlo Study of the Effect of Item Characteristic Curve Estimation on the Accuracy of Three Person-Fit Statistics
Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2009; 33(4): 307 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]