Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Strategies for Controlling Item Exposure in Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Generalized Partial Credit Model

Laurie Laughlin Davis

Pearson Educational Measurement

Choosing a strategy for controlling item exposure has become an integral part of test development for computerized adaptive testing (CAT). This study investigated the performance of six procedures for controlling item exposure in a series of simulated CATs under the generalized partial credit model. In addition to a no-exposure control baseline condition, the randomesque, modified-within-.10-logits, Sympson-Hetter, conditional Sympson-Hetter, a-stratified with multiple-stratification, and enhanced a-stratified with multiple-stratification procedures were implemented to control exposure rates. Two variations of the randomesque and modified-within-.10-logits procedures were examined, which varied the size of the item group from which the next item to be administered was randomly selected. The results indicate that although the conditional Sympson-Hetter provides somewhat lower maximum exposure rates, the randomesque and modified-within-.10-logits procedures with the six-item group variation have great utility for controlling overlap rates and increasing pool utilization and should be given further consideration.

Key Words: computerized adaptive testing • exposure control • CAT item selection • polytomous IRT • generalized partial credit model

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 28, No. 3, 165-185 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0146621604264133


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
V. Lima Passos, M. P. F. Berger, and F. E. Tan
Test Design Optimization in CAT Early Stage with the Nominal Response Model
Applied Psychological Measurement, May 1, 2007; 31(3): 213 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. S. Gorin, B. G. Dodd, S. J. Fitzpatrick, and Y. Y. Shieh
Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Partial Credit Model: Estimation Procedures, Population Distributions, and Item Pool Characteristics
Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2005; 29(6): 433 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]