This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lucke, J. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The and the of Congeneric Test Theory: An Extension of Reliability and Internal Consistency to Heterogeneous Tests

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Psychometric theory focuses primarily on tests that are homogeneous, measuring only one attribute of a psychosocial entity. However, the complexity of psychosocial behavior often requires tests that are heterogeneous, measuring more than one attribute. In this presentation, reliability and internal consistency are extended to heterogeneous tests under the rubric of congeneric test theory. The extensions show that reliability and internal consistency have very similar properties. Reliability and internal consistency are shown to be unique up to a linear transformation. Whereas internal consistency is a lower bound to reliability in the homogeneous case, it is a strict lower bound in the heterogeneous case. Reliability equals internal consistency if and only if the test is homogeneous and true-score equivalent. An analytic argument shows that neither reliability nor internal consistency can detect whether a test is homogeneous or heterogeneous. The reliability (internal consistency) of a heterogeneous test is the sum of the sub-tests’ reliabilities (internal consistencies) plus the sum of reliabilities (internal consistencies) involving the correlations among the sub-tests. Higher-order tests are tests in which items measure first-order attributes, first-order attributes reflect second-order attributes, and so on. Reliability (internal consistency) can be partitioned into the sums of direct reliability (direct internal consistency) for the first-order attributes and indirect reliabilities (indirect internal consistencies) for the second- and higher-order attributes. Simple examples demonstrate that internal consistency may be a poor approximator to the reliability of congeneric tests. Given that reliability for congeneric tests can now be estimated by modern statistical software, the need for internal consistency is diminished. However, internal consistency may be useful in bounding or approximating reliability in general linear latent variable models.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 29, No. 1, 65-81 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0146621604270882


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. J. Ferrando Difficulty, Discrimination, and Information Indices in the Linear Factor Analysis Model for Continuous Item Responses Applied Psychological Measurement, January 1, 2009; 33(1): 9 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]