Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howard, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gerber, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Internal Invalidity in Pretest-Posttest Self-Report Evaluations and a Re-evaluation of Retrospective Pretests

George S. Howard

University of Houston

Kenneth M. Ralph

Lancaster County Office of Mental Health and Mental Retardation

Nancy A. Gulanick

University of Houston

Scott E. Maxwell

University of Houston

Don W. Nance

Wichita State University

Sterling K. Gerber

Eastern Washington State College

True experimental designs (Designs 4, 5, and 6 of Campbell & Stanley, 1963) are thought to provide internally valid results. This paper describes five studies involving the evaluation of various treat ment interventions and identifies a source of inter nal invalidity when self-report measures are used in a Pretest-Posttest manner. An alternative approach (Retrospective Pretest-Posttest design) to measuring change is suggested, and data comparing its ac curacy with the traditional Pretest-Posttest design in measuring treatment effects is presented. Finally, the implications of these findings for evaluation re search using self-report instruments and the strengths and limitations of retrospective measures are discussed.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1-23 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/014662167900300101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
D. Moore and C. A. Tananis
Measuring Change in a Short-Term Educational Program Using a Retrospective Pretest Design
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2009; 30(2): 189 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
P. J. Taylor, D. F. Russ-Eft, and H. Taylor
Gilding the Outcome by Tarnishing the Past: Inflationary Biases in Retrospective Pretests
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2009; 30(1): 31 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
G. Holden, K. Barker, G. Rosenberg, and P. Onghena
The Evaluation Self-Efficacy Scale for Assessing Progress Toward CSWE Accreditation Related Objectives: A Replication
Research on Social Work Practice, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 42 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
G. Holden, K. Barker, G. Rosenberg, and P. Onghena
Assessing Progress Toward Accreditation Related Objectives: Evidence Regarding the Use of Self-Efficacy as an Outcome in the Advanced Concentration Research Curriculum
Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2007; 17(4): 456 - 465.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. Razmjou, A. Yee, M. Ford, and J. A. Finkelstein
Response Shift in Outcome Assessment in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(12): 2590 - 2595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
T. C. M. Lam and P. Bengo
A Comparison of Three Retrospective Self-reporting Methods of Measuring Change in Instructional Practice
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2003; 24(1): 65 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
C. C. Pratt, W. M. McGuigan, and A. R. Katzev
Measuring Program Outcomes: Using Retrospective Pretest Methodology
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2000; 21(3): 341 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
G. Holden, L. Cuzzi, S. Rutter, P. Chernack, and G. Rosenberg
The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: A Replication
Research on Social Work Practice, October 1, 1997; 7(4): 490 - 499.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. Francis-Smythe and P. M. Smith
The Psychological Impact of Assessment in a Development Center
Human Relations, February 1, 1997; 50(2): 149 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
F. R. Rohs and C. A. Langone
Increased Accuracy in Measuring Leadership Impacts
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 1997; 4(1): 150 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
G. Holden, L. Cuzzi, S. Rutter, G. Rosenberg, and P. Chernack
The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: Initial Development
Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 1996; 6(3): 353 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
C. A. Dickenson, C. D. Fisher, J. B. Shaw, and G. N. Southey
Teaching HRM and Managerial Skills with the 'Living Case'
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, March 1, 1996; 33(3): 39 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
E. A. R. Robinson and H. J. Doueck
Implications of the Pre/Post/Then Design for Evaluating Social Group Work
Research on Social Work Practice, April 1, 1994; 4(2): 224 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
K. M. Skeff, G. A. Stratos, and M. R. Bergen
Evaluation of a Medical Faculty Development Program: A Comparison of Traditional Pre/Post and Retrospective Pre/Post Self-Assessment Ratings
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1992; 15(3): 350 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
L. S. Aiken and S. G. West
Invalidity of True Experiments: Self-Report Pretest Biases
Eval Rev, August 1, 1990; 14(4): 374 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
W. A. Randolph and D. F. Elloy
How Can OD Consultants and Researchers Assess Gamma Change? A Comparison of Two Analytical Procedures
Journal of Management, December 1, 1989; 15(4): 633 - 648.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
D. A. Payne
How I Learned to Love "The Standards"
American Journal of Evaluation, November 1, 1988; 9(4): 37 - 44.
[PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
D. A. Payne
How I Learned to Love "The Standards"
American Journal of Evaluation, August 1, 1988; 9(3): 35 - 42.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
K. N. Wexley and T. T. Baldwin
Management Development
Journal of Management, June 1, 1986; 12(2): 277 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
L. M. Collins, J. W. Graham, W. B. Hansen, and C. A. Johnson
Agreement Between Retrospective Accounts of Substance Use and Earlier Reported Substance Use
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1985; 9(3): 301 - 309.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. H. Bray, S. E. Maxwell, and G. S. Howard
Methods of Analysis with Response-Shift BIAS
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1984; 44(4): 781 - 804.
[Abstract]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
N. C. Roberts and J. I. Porras
Progress in Organization Development Research
Group Organization Management, March 1, 1982; 7(1): 91 - 116.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. E. Maxwell and G. S. Howard
Change Scores--Necessarily Anathema?
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 1981; 41(3): 747 - 756.
[Abstract]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
G. S. Howard, J. Millham, S. Slaten, and L. O'Donnell
Influence of Subject Response Style Effects on Retrospective Measures
Applied Psychological Measurement, January 1, 1981; 5(1): 89 - 100.
[Abstract]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
G. S. Howard
A New Look at the Criterion Problem from the Perspective of Gelso's Bubble Hypothesis
The Counseling Psychologist, December 1, 1980; 8(4): 63 - 69.



Home page
Eval RevHome page
G. S. Howard
Response-Shift Bias: A Problem in Evaluating Interventions with Pre/Post Self-Reports
Eval Rev, February 1, 1980; 4(1): 93 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
G. S. Howard, P. R. Dailey, and N. A. Gulanick
The Feasibility of Informed Pretests in Attenuating Response-Shift Bias
Applied Psychological Measurement, October 1, 1979; 3(4): 481 - 494.
[Abstract]