Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ramsay-Curve Item Response Theory for the Three-Parameter Logistic Item Response Model

Carol M. Woods

Washington University in St. Louis, cwoods{at}artsci.wustl.edu

In Ramsay-curve item response theory (RC-IRT), the latent variable distribution is estimated simultaneously with the item parameters of a unidimensional item response model using marginal maximum likelihood estimation. This study evaluates RC-IRT for the three-parameter logistic (3PL) model with comparisons to the normal model and to the empirical histogram method (EHM) implemented in BILOG-MG. Results support the validity and utility of RC-IRT for the 3PL model. RC-IRT and the EHM both performed better than the normal model for nonnormal latent distributions and appeared to have complementary strengths. Item parameter estimates tended to be more accurate with the EHM, especially for shorter tests; however, recovery of the latent distribution was better, and scores were less biased, with RC-IRT. Differences between RC-IRT and the EHM diminished as the sample size and especially the test length increased. Practical recommendations for estimating the latent distribution with the 3PL model are provided.

Key Words: Ramsay curve • RC-IRT • normality assumption • 3PL model • empirical histogram

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 32, No. 6, 447-465 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0146621607308014


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?