Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0146621608329506v1
33/7/538    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Testing for Differential Item Functioning With Measures of Partial Association

Carol M. Woods

Washington University in St. Louis, cwoods{at}artsci.wustl.edu

Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when an item on a test or questionnaire has different measurement properties for one group of people versus another, irrespective of mean differences on the construct. There are many methods available for DIF assessment. The present article is focused on indices of partial association. A family of average conditional ordinal association measures described by Quade is described and empirically compared to the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test, the partial Pearson correlation pr, and the Spearman rank correlation prs. Because coefficients of linear association are not meaningful for the binary and ordinal variables usually used in DIF applications, practitioners are urged to seek alternatives to pr and prs. Some of the Quade-family measures are viable alternatives and performed as well as, or better than, the established MH test. Computer code for calculating the average conditional ordinal measures using the free R program is given.

Key Words: differential item functioning • DIF • partial correlation • ordinal association

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 33, No. 7, 538-554 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0146621608329506


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?