Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emons, W. H. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Detection and Diagnosis of Person Misfit From Patterns of Summed Polytomous Item Scores

Wilco H. M. Emons

Tilburg University, w.h.m.emons{at}uvt.nl

For valid decision making, it is essential to both the person being measured and the person or organization that is having the person measured that the observed scores adequately represent the underlying trait. This study deals with person-fit analysis of polytomous item scores to detect unusual patterns of sum scores on subsets of items. This approach has the advantage that it allows for a diagnostic approach in which specific hypotheses of person misfit can be tested. In a simulation study, the false-positive and detection rates have been investigated under varying test and item characteristics and different types and levels of aberrant response behavior. The performance of the sum-score—based approach is compared with the perforance of the lPz person-fit measure. The simulations show that the person-fit analysis based on sum-score patterns is useful and performs best for detecting aberrant response behavior that manifests itself locally in the pattern, such as careless responding to reverse-worded tems. Statistic lPz performs better for detecting aberrant response behavior that affects the responses globally, such as a tendency to choose extreme response options. The person-fit measures discussed are illustrated using real data from the Neuroticism—Extraversion—Openness Personality Inventory—Revised.

Key Words: item response theory • person-fit analysis • polytomous item response models • reverse-worded items • traitedness

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 33, No. 8, 599-619 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0146621609334378


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
Y. Liu, J. A. Douglas, and R. A. Henson
Testing Person Fit in Cognitive Diagnosis
Applied Psychological Measurement, November 1, 2009; 33(8): 579 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]