Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartnett, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Willingham, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Criterion Problem: What Measure of Success in Graduate Education?

Rodney T. Hartnett

Educational Testing Service

Warren W. Willingham

Educational Testing Service

A wide variety of potential indicators of graduate student performance are reviewed. Based on a scrutiny of relevant research literature and ex perience with recent and current research projects, the various indicators are considered in two ways. First, they are analyzed within the framework of the traditional "criterion problem," that is, with re spect to their adequacy as criteria in predicting graduate school performance. In this case, empha sis is given to problems with the criteria that make it difficult to draw valid inferences about the re lationship between selection measures and perfor mance measures. Second, the various indicators are considered as an important process of the graduate program. In this case, attention is given to their adequacy as procedures for the evaluation of stu dent performance, e.g., their clarity, fairness, and usefulness as feedback to students.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 4, No. 3, 281-291 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168000400301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
A. W. Meade and M. Fetzer
Test Bias, Differential Prediction, and a Revised Approach for Determining the Suitability of a Predictor in a Selection Context
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2009; 12(4): 738 - 761.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
O. S. Chernyshenko and D. S. Ones
How Selective are Psychology Graduate Programs? the Effect of the Selection Ratio on Gre Score Validity
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1999; 59(6): 951 - 961.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
E. L. Goldberg and G. M. Alliger
Assessing the Validity of the Gre for Students in Psychology: A Validity Generalization Approach
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1992; 52(4): 1019 - 1027.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Fabi
A Concurrent Validity Study of the Learning Ability Profile Against College Grade Point Average: Some Canadian Data
Educational and Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1983; 43(3): 859 - 863.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. A. Youngblood and B. J. Martin
Ability Testing and Graduate Admissions: Decision Process Modeling and Validation
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1982; 42(4): 1153 - 1162.
[Abstract]