Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howard, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Is a Behavioral Measure the Best Estimate of Behavioral Parameters? Perhaps Not

George S. Howard

University of Houston

Scott E. Maxwell

University of Houston

Richard L. Wiener

University of Houston

Kathy S. Boynton

University of Houston

William M. Rooney

University of Houston

In many areas of psychological research various measurement procedures are employed in order to obtain estimates of some set of parameter values. A common practice is to validate one measurement device by demonstrating its relationship to some criterion. However, in many cases the measurement of that criterion is less than a perfect estimate of true parameters. Self-report measures are often val idated by comparing them with behavioral mea sures of the dimension of interest. This procedure is only justifiable insofar as the behavioral measure represents an accurate estimate of population parameters. Three studies, dealing with the assess ment of assertiveness, students' in-class verbal and nonverbal behaviors, and a number of teacher-stu dent in-class interactions, tested the adequacy of behavioral versus self-report measures as accurate estimates of behavioral parameters. In Studies 2 and 3 self-reports were found to be as good as be havioral measures as estimates of behavioral pa rameters, while Study 1 found self-reports to be sig nificantly superior.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 4, No. 3, 293-311 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168000400302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
L. K. Lewis, S. A. Hamel, and B. K. Richardson
Communicating Change to Nonprofit Stakeholders: Models and Predictors of Implementers' Approaches
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2001; 15(1): 5 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
P. M. Podsakoff and D. W. Organ
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Journal of Management, December 1, 1986; 12(4): 531 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
G. S. Howard, D. W. Nance, and P. Myers
Adaptive Counseling and Therapy: An Integrative, Eclectic Model
The Counseling Psychologist, July 1, 1986; 14(3): 363 - 442.
[Abstract]


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
J. G. Beck and R. G. Heimberg
Self-Report Assessment of Assertive Behavior: A Critical Analysis
Behav Modif, October 1, 1983; 7(4): 451 - 487.
[Abstract]