Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laosa, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measures for the Study of Maternal Teaching Strategies

Luis M. Laosa

Educational Testing Service

A technique to measure maternal teaching strat egies was developed for possible use in research and evaluation studies. Scores derived from the technique describe both quality and quantity of be haviors used by mothers to teach cognitive-percep tual tasks to their own young children. The mater nal teaching observation technique (MTOT) yields scores on the following teaching strategy dimen sions : inquiry, directive, praise, negative verbal feedback or disapproval, modeling, visual cue, physical affection, positive physical control, and negative physical control. English and Spanish ver sions of the technique were developed. The tech nique was administered to 83 different mother-child dyads of two sociocultural and language groups, Anglo-American and Chicano. The tasks and procedures were sufficiently engaging and ap pealing, in terms of difficulty level and ability to elicit and to maintain the subjects' attention, for mothers and their 5-year-old children in both groups. Interobserver reliabilities and parallel-form consistency were adequate for both groups, indi cating that each MTOT scale measures a mod erately stable attribute of maternal behavior. Group differences in intercorrelations suggest that con struct invariance might not exist across sociocul tural or language groups.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 4, No. 3, 355-366 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168000400307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
A. B. Guimond, M. J. Wilcox, and S. G. Lamorey
The Early Intervention Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale (EIPSES): Scale Construction and Initial Psychometric Evidence
Journal of Early Intervention, September 1, 2008; 30(4): 295 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
J. R. Teichman and J. M. Contreras-Grau
Acculturation and Teaching Styles Among Young Mainland Puerto Rican Mothers
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, February 1, 2006; 28(1): 84 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
Y. R. Harris, D. Terrel, and G. Allen
The Influence of Education Context and Beliefs on the Teaching Behavior of African American Mothers
Journal of Black Psychology, November 1, 1999; 25(4): 490 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
R. Planos, L. H. Zayas, and N. A. Busch-Rossnagel
Acculturation and Teaching Behaviors of Dominican and Puerto Rican Mothers
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, May 1, 1995; 17(2): 225 - 236.
[Abstract]