This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bobko, P. Articles by Rieck, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Large Sample Estimators for Standard Errors of Functions of Correlation Coefficients

University of Maryland

Angela Rieck

University of Maryland

Standard errors of estimators that are functions of correlation coefficients are shown to be quite dif ferent in magnitude than standard errors of the ini tial correlations. A general large-sample methodo logy, based upon Taylor series expansions and asymptotic correlational results, is developed for the computation of such standard errors. Three ex emplary analyses are conducted on a correction for attenuation, a correction for range restriction, and an indirect effect in path analysis. Derived for mulae are consistent with several previously pro posed estimators and provide excellent approxima tions to the standard errors obtained in computer simulations, even for moderate sample size (n = 100). It is shown that functions of correlations can be considerably more variable than product-mo ment correlations. Additionally, appropriate hy pothesis tests are derived for these corrected coeffi cients and the indirect effect. It is shown that in the range restriction situation, the appropriate hypothe sis test based on the corrected coefficient is asymp totically more powerful than the test utilizing the uncorrected coefficient. Bias is also discussed as a by-product of the methodology.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 4, No. 3, 385-398 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168000400309


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. W.-L. Cheung Comparison of methods for constructing confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects Behav Res Methods, May 1, 2009; 41(2): 425 - 438. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. S. Raju and P. A. Brand Determining the Significance of Correlations Corrected for Unreliability and Range Restriction Applied Psychological Measurement, January 1, 2003; 27(1): 52 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Bobko, P. L. Roth, and C. Bobko Correcting the Effect Size of d for Range Restriction and Unreliability Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2001; 4(1): 46 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. Bedeian, D. V. Day, and E. K. Kelloway Correcting for Measurement Error Attenuation in Structural Equation Models: Some Important Reminders Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 1997; 57(5): 785 - 799. [Abstract]

				B. Duan and W. P. Dunlap The Accuracy of Different Methods for Estimating the Standard Error of Correlations Corrected for Range Restriction Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 1997; 57(2): 254 - 265. [Abstract]

				N. L. Allen and S. B. Dunbar Standard Errors of Correlations Adjusted for Incidental Selection Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 1990; 14(1): 83 - 94. [Abstract]

				J. L. Rasmussen Evaluation of Small-Sample Statistics That Test Whether Variables Measure the Same Trait Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1988; 12(2): 177 - 187. [Abstract]

				S. J. Zaccaro and T. T. Collins Excused and Unexcused Absenteeism in Normative Organizations: Effects of Organizational Commitment, Rank, and Interaction Process Group Organization Management, March 1, 1988; 13(1): 81 - 99. [Abstract]

				A. L. Gross and L. E. Fleischman The Correction for Restriction of Range and Nonlinear Regressions: An Analytic Study Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1987; 11(2): 211 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Alexander, P. J. Hanges, and G. M. Alliger An Empirical Examination of Two Transformations of Sample Correlations Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1985; 45(4): 797 - 801. [Abstract]