This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dillon, R. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Analogical Reasoning Under Different Methods of Test Administration

Southern Illinois University

One hundred eighty-five college undergraduates were given the Advanced Progressive Matrices un der one of five conditions of testing: standard, simple feedback, examinee verbalization during problem solution, elaborated feedback, and full elaboration. The Group Embedded Figures Test, Paragraph Completion Test, and Zelniker and Jeff rey's revision of the Matching Familiar Figures Test were also administered. The study was designed (1) to investigate the differential effects of method of test administration on performance for college stu dents and (2) to examine the relationship of individ ual differences dimensions and varying conditions of testing. Analysis of variance coupled with or thogonal comparisons revealed higher levels of per formance under the more elaborative testing condi tions. The cognitive style variables were differential ly related to performance in the different testing conditions. The processing dimensions were related to performance to a higher degree under partially elaborative conditions than under either nonelabor ative procedures or full elaboration. Results are dis cussed in terms of an activation model.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 5, No. 3, 341-347 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168100500307


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?