Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamer, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Nonmetric Interactive Multidimensional Scaling with Multiple Subjects

Robert M. Hamer

Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University

A method for nonmetric interactive multidimen sional scaling (MDS) of similarity judgments is de scribed which is also capable of using responses from previous judges to supplement the judgments of a current subject. The method combines recent advances in interactive MDS with recent advances in numerical methods in MDS to produce a pro gram capable (1) of performing nonmetric interac tive MDS and (2) of fitting a wide variety of models, such as the individual differences model. The empirical investigation compared three versions of the system: (1) a metric simple Euclidean model- fitting version (similar to previous interactive scal ing programs); (2) a metric individual differences version; and (3) a nonmetric individual differences version. There were no statistically significant dif ferences among the three versions.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 5, No. 3, 349-354 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168100500308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?