This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Richards, J. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Standardized versus Unstandardized Regression Weights

The Johns Hopkins University

Behavioral scientists appear widely divided about the merits of standardized versus unstandardized regression weights. The present paper has therefore attempted to clarify the issue by illustrating how the two kinds of weights respond to the following circumstances: selection, or sampling variation, on the independent variable; presence of measurement error; changes in units of measurement; scales that are relative to norms rather than absolute; changes in test length; and selection on dependent and mediating variables. Standardized weights are invariant over changes in the units of measurement; unstandardized weights are invariant over selection on the independent variable (but only on the independent variable) and in the presence of dependent variable error. In general, however, the illustrated circumstances affected both kinds of weights, sometimes quite strongly. Therefore, neither kind of weight appears very robust, neither can be recommended unequivocally for comparing groups, and neither provides a panacea for overcoming problems of analyzing behavioral data.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 6, No. 2, 201-212 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168200600206


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?