Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cicchetti, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Tyrer, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories on Levels of Interrater Reliability : A Monte Carlo Investigation

Domenic V. Cicchetti

VA Medical Center, West Haven CT 06516, U.S.A.

Donald Shoinralter

West Haven VA Medical Center

Peter J. Tyrer

Mapperley Hospital, England

A computer simulation study was designed to in vestigate the extent to which the interrater reliability of a clinical scale is affected by the number of cate gories or scale points (2, 3, 4, ... ,100). Results in dicate that reliability increases steadily up to 7 scale points, beyond which no substantial increases occur, even when the number of scale poirits is increased to as many as 100. These findings hold under the follow ing conditions: (1) The research investigator has insuf ficient a priori knowledge to use as a reliable guide line for deciding on an appropriate number of scale points to employ, and (2) the dichotomous and ordinal categories being considered all have an underlying metric or continuous scale format.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 9, No. 1, 31-36 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168500900103
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. M. Chafouleas, T. J. Christ, and T. C. Riley-Tillman
Generalizability of Scaling Gradients on Direct Behavior Ratings
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2009; 69(1): 157 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
J. L. Viljoen, G. M. Vincent, and R. Roesch
Assessing Adolescent Defendants' Adjudicative Competence: Interrater Reliability and Factor Structure of the Fitness Interview Test-Revised
Criminal Justice and Behavior, August 1, 2006; 33(4): 467 - 487.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
Lei Chang
A Psychometric Evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-Type Scales in Relation to Reliability and Validity
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1994; 18(3): 205 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. J. Russell, J. K. Pinto, and P. Bobko
Appropriate Moderated Regression and Inappropriate Research Strategy: A Demonstration of Information Loss Due to Scale Coarseness
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1991; 15(3): 257 - 266.
[PDF]

Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
K. J. Berry and P. W. Mielke Jr.
A Generalization of Cohen's Kappa Agreement Measure to Interval Measurement and Multiple Raters
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1988; 48(4): 921 - 933.
[Abstract]