This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hattie, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and ltenls

University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia

Various methods for determining unidimensionality are reviewed and the rationale of these methods is as sessed. Indices based on answer patterns, reliability, components and factor analysis, and latent traits are reviewed. It is shown that many of the indices lack a rationale, and that many are adjustments of a previous index to take into account some criticisms of it. After reviewing many indices, it is suggested that those based on the size of residuals after fitting a two- or three-parameter latent trait model may be the most useful to detect unidimensionality. An attempt is made to clarify the term unidimensional, and it is shown how it differs from other terms often used inter changeably such as reliability, internal consistency, and homogeneity. Reliability is defined as the ratio of true score variance to observed score variance. Inter nal consistency denotes a group of methods that are intended to estimate reliability, are based on the vari ances and the covariances of test items, and depend on only one administration of a test. Homogeneity seems to refer more specifically to the similarity of the item correlations, but the term is often used as a synonym for unidimensionality. The usefulness of the terms in ternal consistency and homogeneity is questioned. Uni dimensionality is defined as the existence of one latent trait underlying the data.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 9, No. 2, 139-164 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168500900204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Brinkley, P. M. Diamond, P. R. Magaletta, and C. P. Heigel Cross-Validation of Levenson's Psychopathy Scale in a Sample of Federal Female Inmates Assessment, December 1, 2008; 15(4): 464 - 482. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Neal and D. Gursoy A Multifaceted Analysis of Tourism Satisfaction Journal of Travel Research, August 1, 2008; 47(1): 53 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Yanyan Sheng and C. K. Wikle Bayesian Multidimensional IRT Models With a Hierarchical Structure Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2008; 68(3): 413 - 430. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. G. Waller Commingled Samples: A Neglected Source of Bias in Reliability Analysis Applied Psychological Measurement, May 1, 2008; 32(3): 211 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Deumes Corporate Risk Reporting: A Content Analysis of Narrative Risk Disclosures in Prospectuses Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2008; 45(2): 120 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. Froelich and B. Habing Conditional Covariance-Based Subtest Selection for DIMTEST Applied Psychological Measurement, March 1, 2008; 32(2): 138 - 155. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. A. von Davier and C. Wilson Investigating the Population Sensitivity Assumption of Item Response Theory True-Score Equating Across Two Subgroups of Examinees and Two Test Formats Applied Psychological Measurement, January 1, 2008; 32(1): 11 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Sheng and C. K. Wikle Comparing Multiunidimensional and Unidimensional Item Response Theory Models Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2007; 67(6): 899 - 919. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. A. von Davier and C. Wilson IRT True-Score Test Equating: A Guide Through Assumptions and Applications Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2007; 67(6): 940 - 957. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Reisig, J. Bratton, and M. G. Gertz The Construct Validity and Refinement of Process-Based Policing Measures Criminal Justice and Behavior, August 1, 2007; 34(8): 1005 - 1028. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. A. McHorney Ten Recommendations for Advancing Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement for Older Persons Ann Intern Med, September 2, 2003; 139(5_Part_2): 403 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Reise and J. M. Henson Computerization and Adaptive Administration of the NEO PI-R Assessment, December 1, 2000; 7(4): 347 - 364. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. G. Baker, J. B. Rounds, and M. A. Zevon A Comparison of Graded Response and Rasch Partial Credit Models with Subjective Well-Being Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2000; 25(3): 253 - 270. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. HATTIE, R. M. JAEGER, and L. BOND Chapter 11 : Persistent Methodological Questions in Educational Testing Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1999; 24(1): 393 - 446. [PDF]

				J.-G. Blais and M. D. Laurier The dimensionality of a placement test from several analytical perspectives Language Testing, March 1, 1995; 12(1): 72 - 98. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Buck The appropriacy of psychometric measurement models for testing second language listening comprehension Language Testing, July 1, 1994; 11(2): 145 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Davidson Norms appropriacy of achievement tests: Spanish-speaking children and English children's norms Language Testing, March 1, 1994; 11(1): 83 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Millsap and H. T. Everson Methodology Review: Statistical Approaches for Assessing Measurement Bias Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1993; 17(4): 297 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Nandakumar and W. Stout Refinements of Stout's Procedure for Assessing Latent Trait Unidimensionality Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1993; 18(1): 41 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Henning Dimensionality and construct validity of language tests Language Testing, June 1, 1992; 9(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I.-C. Choi and L. F. Bachman An investigation into the adequacy of three IRT models for data from two EFL reading tests Language Testing, June 1, 1992; 9(1): 51 - 78. [PDF]

				M. Roznowski, L. R Tucker, and L. G. Humphreys Three Approaches to Determining the Dimensionality of Binary Items Applied Psychological Measurement, June 1, 1991; 15(2): 109 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Henning Meanings and implications of the principle of local independence Language Testing, June 1, 1989; 6(1): 95 - 108. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Henning The influence of test and sample dimensionality on latent trait person ability and item difficulty calibrations Language Testing, June 1, 1988; 5(1): 83 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. L. Cook, N. J. Dorans, and D. R. Eignor An Assessment of the Dimensionality of Three SAT-Verbal Test Editions Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1988; 13(1): 19 - 43. [Abstract] [PDF]