Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Applied Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nygren, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Examination of Conditional Violations of Axioms for Additive Conjoint Measurement

Thomas E. Nygren

The Ohio State University

Axiomatic conjoint measurement methodology of fers a useful approach for evaluating different compo sition rules as potential models for fitting the compo nents of multidimensional stimuli. The usefulness of this methodology has been somewhat hindered in ap plied settings because of a lack of an adequate error theory for testing the fit of data to the axioms. This paper presents the results of an attempt to provide a basis for an examination of errors of the conjoint mea surement axioms. Specifically, this paper describes a means of evaluating the fit of an additive conjoint measurement model to a three-factor design. For each of the critical axioms of axiomatic conjoint measure ment, the proportions of errors that would be expected by chance for different levels of satisfaction of the simple independence property are examined. The re sults indicate that violations of these axioms occur much less often than intuitively might be expected. Error proportion tables based on monte carlo analyses are presented to aid in comparisons with empirically obtained results. It is shown that two types of viola tions of the axioms can be defined and used to differ entiate between systematic and unsystematic errors in fallible data.

Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 9, No. 3, 249-264 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/014662168500900303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?