This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brennan, R. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A Discussion of Population Invariance

University of Iowa, robert-brennan{at}uiowa.edu

References

• Brennan, R.L. (2001). An essay on the history and future of reliability from the perspective of replications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 295-317.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Dorans, N. J. (Ed.). (2004). Assessing the population sensitivity of equating functions [Special issue]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41(1).
• Dorans, N.J., & Feigenbaum, M.D. (1994). Equating issues engendered by changes to the SAT and PSAT/NMSQT. In I. M. Lawrence, N. J. Dorans, M. D. Feigenbaum, N. J. Feryok, A. P. Schmitt, & N. K. Wright (Eds.), Technical issues related to the introduction of the new SAT®and PSAT/NMSQT® (ETS Research Memorandum No. RM-94-10). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
• Dorans, N.J., & Holland, P.W. (2000). Population invariance and equatability of tests: Basic theory and the linear case. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 281-306.[CrossRef]
• Dorans, N.J., Liu, J., & Hammond, S. (2008). Anchor test type and population invariance: An exploration across subpopulations and test administrations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 81-97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Feldt, L.S., & Brennan, R.L. (1989). Reliability. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 105-146). New York: Macmillan.
• Feuer, M.J., Holland, P.W., Green, B.F., Bertenthal, M.W., & Hemphill, F.C. (1999). Uncommon measures: Equivalence and linkage among educational tests. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• Flanagan, J.C. (1951). Units, scores, and norms. In E. F. Lindquist (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 695-763). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
• Kolen, M.J. (2004). Population invariance in equating: Concept and history. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 3-14.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Kolen, M.J., & Brennan, R.L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Koretz, D. M., Bertenthal, M. W., & Green, B. F. (Eds.). (1999). Embedding questions: The pursuit of a common measure in uncommon tests. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
• Linn, R.L. (1993). Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(1), 83-102.[CrossRef]
• Liu, M. & Holland, P.W. (2008). Exploring Population Sensitivity of Linking Functions Across Three Law School Admission Test Administrations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 27-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Lord, F.M., & Wingersky, M.S. (1984). Comparison of IRT true-score and equipercentile observed-score ``equatings.'' Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 452-461.
• Mislevy, R.L. (1992). Linking educational assessments: Concepts, issues, methods, and prospects (Policy Information Report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
• Pommerich, M., & Dorans, N. J. (Eds.). (2004). Concordance [Special issue]. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28(4).
• von Davier, A.A., Holland, P.W., & Thayer, D.T. (2003). Population invariance and chain versus post-stratification equating methods. In N. J. Dorans (Ed.), Population invariance of score linking: Theory and applications to Advanced Placement Program®examinations (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-03-27, pp. 19-36). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
• von Davier, A.A., Holland, P.W., & Thayer, D.T. (2004). The chain and post-stratification methods for observed-score equating and their relationship to population invariance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 15-32.[CrossRef][ISI]
• von Davier, A.A., & Wilson, C. (2005). A didactic approach to the use of IRT true score equating (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-05-26). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
• von Davier, A.A., & Wilson, C. (2008). Investigating the Population Sensitivity Assumption of Item Response Theory True-Score Equating Across Two Subgroups of Examinees and Two Test Formats. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 11-26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Yang, W.-L., & Gao, R. (2008). Invariance of Score Linkings Across Gender Groups for Forms of a Testlet-Based College-Level Examination Program Examination. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 45-61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Yi, Q., Harris, D.J., & Gao, X. (2008). Invariance of Equating Functions Across Different Subgroups of Examinees Taking a Science Achievement Test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 62-80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Yin, P., Brennan, R.L., & Kolen, M.J. (2004). Concordance between ACT and ITED scores from different populations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 274-289.[Abstract]

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brennan, R. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?