Applied Psychological Measurement

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samajima, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 18, No. 3, 229-244 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/014662169401800304
© 1994 SAGE Publications

Estimation of Reliability Coefficients Using the Test Information Function and Its Modifications

Fumiko Samajima

University of Tennessee

The reliability coefficient and the standard error of measurement in classical test theory are not properties of a specific test, but are attributed to both a specific test and a specific trait distribution. In latent trait mod els, or item response theory, the test information func tion (TIF) provides more precise local measures of accuracy in trait estimation than are available from the reliability coefficient. The reliability coefficient is still widely used, however, and is popular because of its simplicity. Thus, it is worthwhile to relate it to the TIF. In this paper, the reliability coefficient is predicted from the TIF, or two modified TIF formulas, and a spe cific trait distribution. Examples demonstrate the vari ability of the reliability coefficient across different trait distributions, and the results are compared with empiri cal reliability coefficients. Practical suggestions are given as to how to make better use of the reliability coefficient. Index terms: adaptive testing, bias, clas sical test theory, item information function, latent trait models, maximum likelihood estimation, reliability co efficieno, standard error of measurement, test informa tion function, trait estimation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
W.-C. Wang
A Critique of Raju and Oshima's Prophecy Formulas for Assessing the Reliability of Item Response Theory-Based Ability Estimates
Applied Psychological Measurement, May 1, 2008; 32(3): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
N. S. Raju, L. R. Price, T.C. Oshima, and M. L. Nering
Standardized Conditional SEM: A Case for Conditional Reliability
Applied Psychological Measurement, May 1, 2007; 31(3): 169 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICSHome page
H. Huynh
On Score Locations of Binary and Partial Credit Items and Their Applications to Item Mapping and Criterion-Referenced Interpretation
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1998; 23(1): 35 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]